Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-05-19 | 2018-04-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark has a general score of 80.4, which is better than TCL 10 Pro's 72.1 overall score. Xiaomi Black Shark is a just a bit heavier phone than the TCL 10 Pro, but both are equally thin. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Black Shark has a newer 9.0 Pie version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10.
The Xiaomi Black Shark features a bit faster CPU than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark also has a greater amount of RAM. The TCL 10 Pro features a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Black Shark, because although it has a bit lower display density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a quite larger screen and a lot brighter screen.
TCL 10 Pro captures way better photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the TCL 10 Pro also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera with much more megapixels.
TCL 10 Pro has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the TCL 10 Pro also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB. TCL 10 Pro counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a 14% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.