Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-19 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Ember gray | Iceberg grey and Shadow black |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro is better than TCL 10 Pro, getting an 82.9 score against 72.1. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has newer 9.0 Pie version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10. Although the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro and the TCL 10 Pro were released only a couple of months apart, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro design is a bit thinner but also just a little heavier.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a bit better processing power than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. TCL 10 Pro features a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because although it has a bit worse pixels density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with much more brightness and a little bit bigger screen.
TCL 10 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a larger sensor and a way higher resolution camera.
TCL 10 Pro counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the TCL 10 Pro also has an external memory slot that holds up to 256 GB. The TCL 10 Pro counts with a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has a 4550mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.