Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2021-05-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.41 ounces |
| Ember gray | Mirror Black and Pale Grey |
| Glass and Metal | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 400.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is much better than TCL 10 Pro, having an 88.3 score against 72.1. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 design is newer, but thicker and somewhat heavier than the TCL 10 Pro. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has newer 11 version while TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a little more vivid screen than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has a just a little lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen, a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and more brightness. TCL 10 Pro counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the TCL 10 Pro also has an external memory slot that holds up to 256 GB.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 features a little bit better hardware performance than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also has 2 GB more RAM. The TCL 10 Pro has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a larger sensor taking better quality pictures and a lot higher 64 MP resolution back camera.
The TCL 10 Pro has just a little bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because it has 4550mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is more expensive than the TCL 10 Pro, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.