Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Ember gray | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is way better than the TCL 10 Pro, getting a global score of 87.9 against 72.1. These devices come with the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's design is somewhat heavier but a little bit thinner than the TCL 10 Pro, and both of them were released with only 0 months difference.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little bit better hardware performance than TCL 10 Pro. They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount. The TCL 10 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a quite brighter screen.
TCL 10 Pro features a superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the TCL 10 Pro also has a SD card slot that allows up to 256 GB. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit better camera than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have a same size camera sensor and a back camera with a 64 mega pixels, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a bit better battery life than TCL 10 Pro, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.