Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Ember gray | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a global score of 81.6, which is much better than the TCL 10 Pro's global score of 72.1. Although the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is better than the TCL 10 Pro, it must be noted that it is also a somewhat heavier and a little thicker cellphone. Both of these phones work with the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a little faster CPU than TCL 10 Pro. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 6 GB RAM. TCL 10 Pro features a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with much more brightness and a just a little greater display pixel density.
TCL 10 Pro has a superior memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 256 GB, the TCL 10 Pro also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's camera is very similar to the TCL 10 Pro one, and although the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures and/or video in low light situations, they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the same video frame rate, the same video definition and a same size back-facing camera sensor.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with just a little better battery performance than TCL 10 Pro, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.