Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2021-05-26 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Ember gray | Aurora Green, Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray and Nighttime Blue |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A76 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G is much better than the TCL 10 Pro, having a 79.5 score against 72.1. These phones use Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has newer 11 version and TCL 10 Pro has Android 10 version, providing some extra features. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G's body is newer and just a little bit thinner than the TCL 10 Pro's, although it is a little bit heavier.
The TCL 10 Pro has just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a just a bit inferior number of pixels per display inch, they both have a screen with the same size. The TCL 10 Pro has a superior memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
TCL 10 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G feature quite similar CPUs, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G counts with a little better battery performance than TCL 10 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The TCL 10 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the TCL 10 Pro also has a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.