Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.32 ounces |
| Ember gray | Black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 400.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.97 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer is a lot better than the TCL 10 Pro, getting a 91.5 score against 72.1. Even though Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer is just a little bit heavier than TCL 10 Pro, it's a bit thinner and also noticeably newer. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has the newer 12 version and TCL 10 Pro has Android 10.
TCL 10 Pro features a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a quite higher display pixels density and a little more brightness. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer features slightly more storage for applications and games than TCL 10 Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer features a bit faster processing unit than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a greater amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a superior camera than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a larger back-facing camera sensor, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light images and video and a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
TCL 10 Pro has a bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because it has 4550mAh of battery capacity against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.