Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-19 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Ember gray | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is a bit better than TCL 10 Pro, having a 76.6 score against 72.1. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 design is a little heavier but just a little bit thinner than the TCL 10 Pro, and both were released with only 0 months difference. Both devices in this comparison review come with the same Android 10 OS (operating system).
The TCL 10 Pro has a brighter display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9. They have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the same display pixels density and a display with the same size. TCL 10 Pro counts with a bit better processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the TCL 10 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The TCL 10 Pro counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB and more internal storage. TCL 10 Pro counts with a superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the TCL 10 Pro also has a camera in the back with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution, a lot higher (4K) video resolution and a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with just a little better battery life than TCL 10 Pro, because it has a 10% greater battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is also a lot cheaper, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.