Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-19 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Ember gray | Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 986 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 10 Pro is better than TCL 10 Pro, getting a general score of 80.2 against 72.1. ZTE Axon 10 Pro's construction is thinner and a little bit lighter than the TCL 10 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released about 13 months before. Both phones in this comparison review work with the same Android 10 OS.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a bit faster processing unit than TCL 10 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. TCL 10 Pro features a little more vivid screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro. They have a display with the same size, a better pixels quantity per inch of display and an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340.
TCL 10 Pro shoots a little bit better videos and photos than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the TCL 10 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than TCL 10 Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal memory and an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. TCL 10 Pro features just a bit better battery life than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a 4550mAh battery capacity.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro costs a lot more money than TCL 10 Pro, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.