Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67.8 | 73.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-19 | 2019-08-27 |
| 6.38 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mariana blue | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 250.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1520 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 271 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A10s has an overall score of 73.8, which is slightly better than TCL 10L's 67.8 global score. The Galaxy A10s construction is just a little lighter and a bit thinner than the TCL 10L, even though both of them were released with only a couple of months difference. Both phones in our current comparison work with the same Android 11 operating system, so both should offer identical operating system features.
TCL 10L features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the TCL 10L also has a larger amount of RAM. TCL 10L features a better display than Galaxy A10s, because it has a little bit bigger display, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a higher quantity of pixels per inch of display.
The TCL 10L features a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 32 GB more internal memory capacity. TCL 10L takes a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the TCL 10L also has a way higher 3840x2160 video definition and a way higher resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy A10s's battery duration is just as good as the battery lifetime in TCL 10L.
Samsung Galaxy A10s not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.