Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone XS has a global score of 84.2, which is better than TCL 20 5G's general score of 73.1. Despite of the fact that the iPhone XS is way older than the TCL 20 5G, it's design is thinner and somewhat lighter. Apple iPhone XS features a more powerful processor than TCL 20 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
IPhone XS counts with a bit sharper screen than TCL 20 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1125 x 2436 resolution, a brighter screen and a bit more pixels per inch in the display. TCL 20 5G counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than iPhone XS, because it has a SD card slot that admits up to 256 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
TCL 20 5G has a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2659mAh. The TCL 20 5G takes better photos and videos than iPhone XS, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same aperture, the TCL 20 5G also counts with a way more MP back-facing camera and a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.