Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | Black, Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has a general score of 80.2, which is a bit better than TCL 20 5G's 73.1 general score. The Google Pixel construction is a little thinner and notably lighter than TCL 20 5G, although it was released 4 years before. TCL 20 5G has a bit better looking display than Google Pixel, because although it has a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a really bigger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 2400 x 1080.
TCL 20 5G has just a little better performance than Google Pixel, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores (although slower). TCL 20 5G takes much better photos and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the TCL 20 5G also has a back facing camera with way more mega pixels, a bigger camera aperture for better captures in poorly lited situations and a larger back camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs.
The TCL 20 5G has a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the TCL 20 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 256 GB. The TCL 20 5G has a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.