Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is a bit better than the TCL 20 5G, having a general score of 80 against 73.1. Google Pixel 3's construction is extremely lighter and thinner than the TCL 20 5G, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. TCL 20 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a larger display and a little higher 2400 x 1080px resolution.
The Google Pixel 3 has just a little better processing power than TCL 20 5G, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. TCL 20 5G counts with a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that supports up to 256 GB.
TCL 20 5G takes much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same size aperture, the TCL 20 5G also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and pictures and a lot better 48 megapixels resolution back camera.
The TCL 20 5G features a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 54% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.