Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is much better than TCL 20 5G's general score of 73.1. Even though the Google Pixel 4 is older than TCL 20 5G, it's design is somewhat thinner and lighter. Google Pixel 4 features a display that is just as good as TCL 20 5G's display, because although the Google Pixel 4 has a quite lower 1080 x 2280 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher screen density.
TCL 20 5G features a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that admits up to 256 GB. The Google Pixel 4 has a bit superior processor than TCL 20 5G. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount.
The TCL 20 5G counts with a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. The TCL 20 5G shoots better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the TCL 20 5G also counts with a camera with way more mega pixels and a much bigger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.