Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.33 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 has a general score of 77.7, which is a little bit better than the TCL 20 5G's overall score of 73.1. Even though the HTC One M9 is way older and just a bit thicker than the TCL 20 5G, it's design is still lighter. Both devices in this comparison use Android operating system, but the HTC One M9 has 5.0 version and TCL 20 5G has Android 10.
HTC One M9 counts with a more vivid screen than TCL 20 5G, because although it has a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a really smaller display, it also counts with a little better pixel amount in each inch of display. HTC One M9 features a little bit better hardware performance than TCL 20 5G, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics processor and a 64 bits CPU.
The TCL 20 5G captures better photographs and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the TCL 20 5G also has a larger aperture, a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
The TCL 20 5G features a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. The TCL 20 5G counts with a really longer battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.