Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra is a little bit better than TCL 20 5G, getting a overall score of 77 against 73.1. The HTC U Ultra design is somewhat lighter and thinner than the TCL 20 5G, even though it was released many years before. HTC U Ultra counts with a little sharper screen than TCL 20 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better screen density.
HTC U Ultra counts with a quite bigger memory to install games and applications than TCL 20 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. TCL 20 5G counts with a little better performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores (although they are slower).
The TCL 20 5G captures much clearer pictures and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same diafragm aperture, the TCL 20 5G also has a larger sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality and a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The TCL 20 5G counts with a very superior battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.