Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is much better than the TCL 20 5G, getting a global score of 81.3 against 73.1. LG V35 ThinQ's design is somewhat thinner and extremely lighter than the TCL 20 5G, even though it was released 3 years before. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better processing power than TCL 20 5G. They have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid display than TCL 20 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel quantity in each inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution. The TCL 20 5G shoots better pictures and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the TCL 20 5G also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs and a camera with way more mega pixels.
LG V35 ThinQ features more memory for apps and games than TCL 20 5G, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The TCL 20 5G features longer battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.