Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | Interstellar Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has an overall score of 83.4, which is much better than TCL 20 5G's 73.1 general score. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro construction is a lot newer, a bit thinner and just a little lighter than TCL 20 5G. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a newer 13 version and TCL 20 5G has Android 10 version, so it provides you a couple additional features and performance tweaks.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a slightly better looking screen than TCL 20 5G, and although they both have a screen with the same size, a better number of pixels per display inch and an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has way more display brightness. TCL 20 5G has a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than TCL 20 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera, a lot larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a slightly better memory for apps and games than TCL 20 5G, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bit superior battery life than TCL 20 5G, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.