Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.33 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is better than the TCL 20 5G's 73.1 general score. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a a lot newer cellphone, and it's also just a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than TCL 20 5G. Both devices we are comparing here use Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version while TCL 20 5G has Android 10.
TCL 20 5G has a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a better looking display than TCL 20 5G, and although they both have the same amount of pixels per inch in the display, the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a screen with the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has much more brightness.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a bit better camera than TCL 20 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a much larger sensor taking lot better quality videos and pictures, a larger camera aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited situations, faster video frame rate and a camera with more megapixels.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior storage for games and applications than TCL 20 5G, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's battery duration is just as good as TCL 20 5G's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.