Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto Z2 Force Edition has a global score of 77.4, which is a bit better than the TCL 20 5G's 73.1 overall score. Moto Z2 Force Edition's body is thinner and incredibly lighter than the TCL 20 5G, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features just a bit better looking display than TCL 20 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a bit more powerful processor than TCL 20 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The TCL 20 5G has a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the TCL 20 5G also has a back camera with much more mega pixels, a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a bigger aperture.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with more memory capacity to install games and applications than TCL 20 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. TCL 20 5G counts with a much longer battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2730mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.