Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto Z2 Play has a score of 77.4, which is just a bit better than TCL 20 5G's global score of 73.1. The Moto Z2 Play is an a lot older device than the TCL 20 5G, but Motorola managed to make it incredibly thinner and a lot lighter anyway. The TCL 20 5G features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a little lower amount of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly higher 2400 x 1080 resolution.
Moto Z2 Play features a better memory to store more games and applications than TCL 20 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. TCL 20 5G and Moto Z2 Play feature extremely similar processors, and although the Moto Z2 Play has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
TCL 20 5G counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. TCL 20 5G has a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting photos and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the TCL 20 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.