Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-12-07 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto Z3 is slightly better than TCL 20 5G, getting a overall score of 77.6 against 73.1. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Moto Z3 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while TCL 20 5G has Android 10, offering some nice extra features and improved performance. Although the Moto Z3 is a lot older than the TCL 20 5G, it's construction is way thinner and noticeably lighter.
Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a little bit better performance than TCL 20 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The TCL 20 5G counts with a little bit better looking display than Moto Z3, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a little higher 2400 x 1080 resolution.
The TCL 20 5G takes much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the TCL 20 5G also has a larger camera aperture, a lot more megapixels camera in the back and a lot larger camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and photographs.
Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a better storage to install games and applications than TCL 20 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The TCL 20 5G counts with a superior battery performance than Moto Z3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.