Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is slightly better than TCL 20 5G, getting a score of 79.8 against 73.1. Although the Motorola One Hyper is older than TCL 20 5G, it's construction is just a little lighter and just a little bit thinner. These phones work with Android OS, but the Motorola One Hyper has a more recent 11 version while TCL 20 5G has Android 10 version, offering some additional features.
TCL 20 5G features just a bit better screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit inferior number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a bit higher 2400 x 1080px resolution. Motorola One Hyper counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for apps and games than TCL 20 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola One Hyper also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The TCL 20 5G has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the TCL 20 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. Motorola One Hyper captures just a bit better pictures and videos than TCL 20 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photos and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
TCL 20 5G has a bit longer battery duration than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.