Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | Blue and Brown |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision is much better than the TCL 20 5G, having a overall score of 80.7 against 73.1. The Motorola One Vision design is a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than TCL 20 5G, even though it was released around a year before. Motorola One Vision's CPU is just as good as the processing unit in TCL 20 5G, and although the Motorola One Vision has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
TCL 20 5G has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 2400 x 1080px and a just a little worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a little larger screen. Motorola One Vision features a bit better camera than TCL 20 5G, and although they both have a 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, the same video frame rates, the same back-facing camera sensor size and the same video resolution, the Motorola One Vision also has a bigger camera aperture for better photos and video in low light environments.
Motorola One Vision has slightly more memory to install applications and games than TCL 20 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Vision also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. TCL 20 5G counts with superior battery lifetime than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 29% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.