Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | Meteor grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a general score of 80.3, which is a little bit better than the TCL 20 5G's overall score of 73.1. Nokia 8 V 5G UW's body is just a bit heavier but a little bit thinner than the TCL 20 5G, and both of them were released with only 1 months difference. Both devices in this review include the same Android 10 OS (Operating System).
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a bit better hardware performance than TCL 20 5G. They have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. The TCL 20 5G has a little bit better screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 2400 x 1080px resolution, the TCL 20 5G also counts with a little bit better display pixels density.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a little bit better camera than TCL 20 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels, a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
The TCL 20 5G counts with a slightly better memory capacity for applications and games than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 256 GB against 1000 GB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. TCL 20 5G and Nokia 8 V 5G UW count with quite similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.