Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is much better than TCL 20 5G, getting a general score of 83.8 against 73.1. Galaxy A50 is an older cellphone than the TCL 20 5G, but Samsung was able to build it somewhat lighter and thinner. TCL 20 5G counts with a bit better display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a just a bit lower count of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a quite better resolution of 2400 x 1080px.
The Galaxy A50 features a bit better processor than TCL 20 5G, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The TCL 20 5G features a better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way higher 48 MP resolution back-facing camera, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lot larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than TCL 20 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB. TCL 20 5G has a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has a 13% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.