Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is way better than TCL 20 5G's 73.1 global score. Galaxy A52's construction is just a bit thinner and just a little lighter than TCL 20 5G, although both were released only a couple of months apart. The TCL 20 5G has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density, and they both have the same resolution of 2400 x 1080, the TCL 20 5G also counts with a quite larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a better storage capacity for games and applications than TCL 20 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 features a bit better processor than TCL 20 5G. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A52 has a battery performance that is just as good as the battery duration in TCL 20 5G. Samsung Galaxy A52 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than TCL 20 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a much better resolution back camera and a larger camera sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.