Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.33 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) has a score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than the TCL 20 5G's 73.1 global score. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017)'s design is a bit lighter and thinner than the TCL 20 5G, even though it was released many years before. TCL 20 5G features a bit faster processor than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the TCL 20 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
TCL 20 5G features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a just a little greater display density, a quite better 2400 x 1080 resolution and a bigger display. TCL 20 5G features a superior storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have a SD extension slot that holds up to 256 GB, the TCL 20 5G also has 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
The TCL 20 5G features superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3600mAh. TCL 20 5G takes way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a back camera with a much higher 48 MP resolution, a larger aperture and a way better 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.