Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-12-07 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is much better than TCL 20 5G's global score of 73.1. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and TCL 20 5G has Android 10, so it provides lots of additional features. Samsung Galaxy Fold's body is incredibly thinner than TCL 20 5G, although it's notably heavier and was released about a year before.
The Galaxy Fold has a little faster CPU than TCL 20 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Fold also has 6 GB more RAM. The TCL 20 5G features a little bit better looking display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 2400 x 1080px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display.
The TCL 20 5G shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has slower video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the TCL 20 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels camera in the back and a lot larger back camera sensor.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than TCL 20 5G, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory. TCL 20 5G counts with just a little better battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.