Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.33 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has an overall score of 80.4, which is just a bit better than TCL 20 5G's global score of 73.1. Galaxy Note Fan Edition's construction is thinner and somewhat lighter than TCL 20 5G, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little bit better processing power than TCL 20 5G, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with just a bit better display than TCL 20 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. TCL 20 5G features a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 256 GB, the TCL 20 5G also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
TCL 20 5G has a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. TCL 20 5G shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the TCL 20 5G also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a better image and video quality and a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.