Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 Active has a general score of 75.8, which is slightly better than the TCL 20 5G's overall score of 73.1. Despite of the fact the Galaxy S7 Active is older and just a bit thicker than TCL 20 5G, it's design is still somewhat lighter. TCL 20 5G features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and more cores.
Galaxy S7 Active features a sharper screen than TCL 20 5G, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per display inch, a bit brighter display and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. TCL 20 5G counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 256 GB.
TCL 20 5G features just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The TCL 20 5G shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the TCL 20 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.