Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is much better than TCL 20 5G, with an 81 score against 73.1. These devices use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has newer 11 version while TCL 20 5G has Android 10. Although it's the best in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's design is older, a little bit thicker and a little heavier than TCL 20 5G.
TCL 20 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a just a bit worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a little bit higher 2400 x 1080 resolution. Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit better processing power than TCL 20 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
TCL 20 5G captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos and a camera with a way higher resolution.
The TCL 20 5G features a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. TCL 20 5G counts with a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.