Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is much better than the TCL 20 5G's 73.1 overall score. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's body is incredibly thinner and lighter than TCL 20 5G, even though they were released only a couple months apart. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version while TCL 20 5G has Android 10, so it provides you a couple additional features.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit faster processor than TCL 20 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM. The TCL 20 5G counts with just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a little bit lower pixels density and a quite lower resolution of 2400 x 1080px, they both have a screen with the same size.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a bit bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than TCL 20 5G, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB more internal storage capacity. TCL 20 5G counts with better battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The TCL 20 5G counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the TCL 20 5G also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor capturing much higher quality pictures and videos and a lot better resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.