Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is way better than the TCL 20 5G's global score of 73.1. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is extremely thinner but noticeably heavier than the TCL 20 5G, and they were released only 3 months apart. These phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a newer 11 version while TCL 20 5G has Android 10.
The TCL 20 5G counts with a bit better display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 2400 x 1080px, it also counts with a little greater screen pixel density. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a slightly better memory to store more apps and games than TCL 20 5G, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit superior processing unit than TCL 20 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM. The TCL 20 5G and the Galaxy Z Fold 2 both feature extremely similar battery performance. TCL 20 5G features a little bit better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking worse quality videos and pictures and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have a same size camera aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the TCL 20 5G also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.