Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 87.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2020-10-12 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | Black, Blue and Grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 848.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 449 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.33 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xperia 5 II has a general score of 87.2, which is much better than the TCL 20 5G's general score of 73.1. The Xperia 5 II design is notably lighter and thinner than the TCL 20 5G, even when they were released with only a couple months difference. The Xperia 5 II counts with a bit more powerful processor than TCL 20 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xperia 5 II also has more RAM.
Xperia 5 II has a display that's just as good as the TCL 20 5G one, because although the Xperia 5 II has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution and a just a bit higher quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen. TCL 20 5G has a slightly better camera than Xperia 5 II, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing less light and duller colors, a smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos in low-light situations and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the TCL 20 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The Xperia 5 II counts with a quite bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than TCL 20 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Xperia 5 II also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. TCL 20 5G has a little better battery performance than Xperia 5 II, because it has a 13 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.