Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | Blasting black |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has an overall score of 90.1, which is much better than TCL 20 5G's score of 73.1. Both of these phones use the same Android 10 OS (operating system). Even being the best phone in this comparison review, we must tell that it is also a a little heavier and thicker phone.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a bit better screen than TCL 20 5G, because it has a quite larger display, a bit more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with just a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than TCL 20 5G, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a little faster processor than TCL 20 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features just a bit better battery duration than TCL 20 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a little bit better camera than TCL 20 5G, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality, faster 60 fps video frame rate and a way higher 64 MP resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.