Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2017-10-10 |
| 6.54 x 3.02 x 0.36 inches | 5.98 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Mist Gray and Placid Blue | Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 614.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 2400 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 is much better than the TCL 20 5G, getting a overall score of 81.2 against 73.1. The Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 construction is lighter and somewhat thinner than TCL 20 5G, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than TCL 20 5G. Both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 cores.
The TCL 20 5G features a little sharper display than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, because although it has a just a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a quite better resolution of 2400 x 1080. The TCL 20 5G features a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the TCL 20 5G also has a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images and a lot larger back camera sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality.
Xiaomi Mi MIX 2 counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than TCL 20 5G, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The TCL 20 5G features greater battery performance than Xiaomi Mi MIX 2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.