Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-20 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | Black, Gray and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel has a score of 80.2, which is a bit better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G's score of 76.1. Google Pixel is an older phone than TCL 20 Pro 5G, but it is a lot lighter and a little bit thinner anyway. The TCL 20 Pro 5G has just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel, because it has a higher number of cores and more RAM.
The Google Pixel counts with a slightly better looking display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a lot smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a bit better pixel quantity in each inch of screen. The TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a bigger aperture to take better images in low-light environments, a larger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality videos and pictures and a much better 48 megapixels resolution camera.
TCL 20 Pro 5G has a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel, because it has 256 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB. The TCL 20 Pro 5G features a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.