Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-20 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | Black and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL has a global score of 82.5, which is just a bit better than TCL 20 Pro 5G's 76.1 general score. The Google Pixel 2 XL body is just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than TCL 20 Pro 5G, even though it was released 4 years before. Google Pixel 2 XL has a bit better performance than TCL 20 Pro 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Google Pixel 2 XL features a bit better display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a superior camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same video frame rates, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a way larger camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage and a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB. The TCL 20 Pro 5G has greater battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.