Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-20 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is just a bit better than TCL 20 Pro 5G, with an 80 score against 76.1. Although the Google Pixel 3 is notably older than TCL 20 Pro 5G, it's body is somewhat thinner and a lot lighter. The Google Pixel 3 has a little sharper screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a quite better pixel density.
The Google Pixel 3 has just a little better processing power than TCL 20 Pro 5G, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. TCL 20 Pro 5G has much more storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh. TCL 20 Pro 5G features a superior camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a camera with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution and a way bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.