Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-20 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is a bit better than TCL 20 Pro 5G, with a score of 78.8 against 76.1. Google Pixel 3a is an older phone than TCL 20 Pro 5G, but it is somewhat thinner and way lighter anyway. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 operating system. TCL 20 Pro 5G has a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 3a has a little more vivid screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2220px and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density. TCL 20 Pro 5G has a superior camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a F1.8 aperture, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a lot better resolution camera in the back and a lot bigger sensor.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1 TB and 256 GB internal storage capacity. The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 50% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.