Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-20 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is a little bit better than TCL 20 Pro 5G, having an 81.9 score against 76.1. Although Google Pixel 4 is older than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, it's design is somewhat lighter and thinner. The Google Pixel 4 features a bit more vivid display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2280px resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per screen inch.
The Google Pixel 4 features a little better processing power than TCL 20 Pro 5G. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cpu cores. TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a much better storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a much better battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. TCL 20 Pro 5G shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also counts with a way larger back camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures and a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.