Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-04-20 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | Clearly white and Just black |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than TCL 20 Pro 5G, having an 87.5 score against 76.1. Even when the Google Pixel 4a 5G and TCL 20 Pro 5G were released with only 5 months difference, the Google Pixel 4a 5G is somewhat thinner and lighter. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a slightly better screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater screen pixel density. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit better CPU than TCL 20 Pro 5G. They have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G takes much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photos and slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels back-facing camera and a much larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The TCL 20 Pro 5G has just a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.