Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-20 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Glass | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is better than TCL 20 Pro 5G's 76.1 global score. Google Pixel 5's body is somewhat thinner and a lot lighter than TCL 20 Pro 5G, even when they were released with only a few months difference. The Google Pixel 5 features a little better processing power than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 5 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with a little bit better looking display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of display. TCL 20 Pro 5G captures much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures in low light environments and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also counts with a way larger camera sensor which gives a much better image and video quality and a lot more megapixels back camera.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G features much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. TCL 20 Pro 5G features a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.