Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-04-20 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Glass | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 has a global score of 77.7, which is a little bit better than TCL 20 Pro 5G's global score of 76.1. The HTC One M9 is a incredibly older and a bit thicker cellphone than TCL 20 Pro 5G, but HTC was able to build it somewhat lighter anyway. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but HTC One M9 has 5.0 version while TCL 20 Pro 5G has Android 11 version.
The HTC One M9 features a more vivid display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a little better number of pixels per screen inch. TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than HTC One M9, because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB and 256 GB internal storage.
HTC One M9 features just a little better processing power than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has 3 GB less RAM, and they both have 8 cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a graphics processor and a 64-bits CPU. The TCL 20 Pro 5G features a much better battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 58% greater battery capacity.
TCL 20 Pro 5G has a superior camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photographs, a way more mega-pixels camera and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.