Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-20 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | 16 777 216 |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra is just a bit better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, having a global score of 77 against 76.1. HTC U Ultra is an extremely older phone than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, but it is thinner and lighter anyway. The TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a bit superior processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has a greater number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a little bit better looking screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a very superior memory to store more apps and games than HTC U Ultra, because although it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G features a much longer battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The TCL 20 Pro 5G takes much clearer pictures and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same video definition, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a much higher resolution camera in the back and a bigger sensor taking higher quality photographs and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.