Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-20 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | Titan gray |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG K92 is better than TCL 20 Pro 5G, having an 85.4 score against 76.1. Even though LG K92 and the TCL 20 Pro 5G were released only 5 months apart, the LG K92 construction is just a bit heavier but just a bit thinner than the TCL 20 Pro 5G. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the LG K92 has the older 10 version while TCL 20 Pro 5G has Android 11 version.
LG K92 features a display that's just as good as the TCL 20 Pro 5G one, both have a display with the same size, the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution and the same pixels density. The TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a bit more storage for apps and games than LG K92, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage.
LG K92 and TCL 20 Pro 5G both have extremely similar processors, both have a Octa-Core processing unit and 6 GB of RAM. The LG K92 shoots slightly better photographs and videos than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same camera sensor size, the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the LG K92 also has a lot more MP camera in the back.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a bit longer battery lifetime than LG K92, because it has a 13% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.