Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-04-20 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo is slightly better than TCL 20 Pro 5G, having a overall score of 81.9 against 76.1. Both devices we are comparing work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has 14 version while TCL 20 Pro 5G has Android 11. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's design is way newer, thinner and lighter than the TCL 20 Pro 5G.
TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much better screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher number of pixels in each inch of display and a quite better 1256 x 2760 resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo captures a little bit better photos and videos than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same video quality, the same aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a lot bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with more megapixels.
TCL 20 Pro 5G has a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, and although they both have equal internal memory, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. TCL 20 Pro 5G has a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4310mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.