Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-04-20 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, with a general score of 86.3 against 76.1. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a incredibly newer phone, and it's also somewhat thinner and a bit lighter than TCL 20 Pro 5G. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a more recent 14 version and TCL 20 Pro 5G has Android 11.
TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a more vivid screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G. Both have a same size display, the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution and a higher pixels number in each screen inch.
TCL 20 Pro 5G has slightly more memory to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB. Motorola Edge 50 Pro captures just a bit better photographs and videos than TCL 20 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a way larger diafragm aperture for better low light photos and video, a much bigger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs and a higher resolution back-facing camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro's battery performance is very similar to the TCL 20 Pro 5G one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.