Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-04-20 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Marine Blue and Moondust Gray | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The TCL 20 Pro 5G is just a bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force, having a 76.1 score against 75.8. These phones include Android operating system, but TCL 20 Pro 5G has older 11 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. TCL 20 Pro 5G is a noticeably newer phone than the Motorola Moto Z Force, although it is heavier and way thicker.
TCL 20 Pro 5G has a bit superior processing unit than Moto Z Force, because it has 4 more CPU cores (but slower) and 2 GB more RAM. The Moto Z Force has a bit more vivid screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher pixel quantity per screen inch.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z Force, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. TCL 20 Pro 5G has superior battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G captures better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a way more megapixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.